Managing performance is a continuous process of timely and effective communication between managers, supervisors, and employees. Radford University supports and is committed to an annual performance management process to foster the development of each person and to help the individual employee be successful in his/her work assignment as well as to accomplish the University’s mission and goals. Performance management aids the individual employee with communication and understanding expectations on a regular basis, and it provides ongoing, timely, and descriptive, informal, and formal feedback. The process should promote motivating employees to perform their best and should be conducted with fairness and transparency.
Performance Management is year-round and begins with performance planning, continues with counseling, mentoring, and ends with the performance evaluation. The Performance Plan and the Performance Evaluation are created using the PeopleAdmin system, search 'PeopleAdmin' on the OneCampus portal.
Primary Performance management Contact: Jenene Lewis | firstname.lastname@example.org | 540-831-7286
- Administrative/Professional Faculty: Annual cycle from October 25th - October 24th Please refer to the AP Handbook | PDF.
- Classified Staff: Annual cycle from October 25th - October 24th. Evaluation Due Date: October 25th.
- Wage Employees: There is no formal evaluation form or process, but supervisors are encouraged to give continuous performance feedback throughout the year.
- Teaching and Research Faculty: Please refer to the T&R Handbook.
The reviewer is normally the supervisor of the person performing the evaluation. In some departments, there may be one reviewer for the entire department.
- Confirms supporting documentation.
- Ensures consistency among supervisors.
- Ensures performance has been appraised fairly.
- Makes decisions on appeals.
Handling Evaluation Appeals
- Classified Employees: May appeal to the reviewer within 10 workdays of receiving the evaluation. The reviewer will provide a response within 5 workdays. The reviewer can uphold, revise, or rewrite the evaluation. An employee may also file a grievance if he/she feels the evaluation is arbitrary or capricious.
- Admin/Professional Faculty: Refer to the AP Handbook | PDF
Employees are encouraged to seek assistance with performance and clarify their responsibilities through ongoing conversations with supervisors. Employees are also encouraged to do a self-evaluation which helps them assess strengths and weaknesses. They should actively participate in their performance appraisal discussions and provide feedback to supervisors about their performance. Employees will acknowledge their performance plan as well as their performance evaluation in the PeopleAdmin system in thier OneCampus portal.
All full-time classified and probationary employees must have a performance plan.
During this phase of the process, employees and supervisors work in conjunction with each other to develop a performance plan that aligns the efforts of supervisors and employees with departmental and university goals.
Together the supervisor and employee will:
- Define or clarify the core responsibilities of the job by reviewing the Job Description that you can find in the PeopleAdmin system in your OneCampus portal.
- Determine measurable performance expectations or levels of achievement for each core responsibility that is defined in the Job Description based on the percentage of your duties and responsibilities.
- Create a Development Plan to include learning goals and specific steps to be taken to accomplish these goals that align with our SMART Goal guidelines
- The supervisor, reviewer and employee will acknowledge the Performance Plan. The Performance Plan is not required to be filed in the employee's personnel file maintained in the Office of Human Resources.
Each October, employees are asked to develop a new performance plan that outlines goals and objectives for the coming year. The plans are created using the PeopleAdmin system in your OneCampus portal. New performance plans should be finalized by mid-November of each year.
Newly hired/rehired employees or those moving from one position to another will need a performance plan completed within 30 days of the hire or transfer.
Continuous coaching and feedback occur throughout the performance period. During the performance period, the supervisor and employee should regularly discuss work progress, new assignments, changes in procedures, etc. During these discussions, the supervisor has an opportunity to provide constructive feedback and direction to the employee.
Employee Relations is available to assist employees and supervisors when any part of the Performance Management process is not working well.
- Timely: Don't wait. Give feedback as soon after the performance takes place (positive and negative).
- Specific: Tell exactly what the employee did that was good or needs improvement. Don't leave the employee guessing which part of their behavior needs improvement. The focus should be on the behavior, not the individual.
- Sincere: Be honest and open. Tell the employee what their performance affected.
If the performance needs improvement during the year and training and development would be beneficial, ensure that the employee be allowed the opportunity to participate.
- Memo or follow-up email: Follow up a performance discussion with a written memo or email to clarify the performance issues discussed. List examples and consequences for the department on fellow employees. Offer your support with follow up steps and reiterate the need for change and potential consequences if it does not improve.
- Supervisor Documentation: Keep a paper file or password protected online file as a source of documentation.
If the individual is having performance issues and does not improve after discussions, please contact Employee Relations for consultation.
For Classified and A/P employees there is a choice of five ratings:
- Exemplary - Performance far exceeded expectations due to exceptionally high quality of work performed, resulting in an overall quality of work that was superior and either: 1.) Included the completion of a major goal or project, or 2.) Made an exceptional or unique contribution in support of unit, department, or university objectives. Employees displays a level of proficiency that not only exceeds expectations but also has made a significant and/or lasting contribution(s) during this appraisal period. If the overall review rating is “Exemplary”, two Extraordinary Contributor forms are required to be attached in the evaluations.
- Exceeds Expectations - The employee displays solid, consistent performance and a level of proficiency that is considerably higher than expected and does so on a consistent basis. Performance consistently exceeded expectations, and the quality of work overall was excellent.
- Meets Expectations - Acceptable performance where the employee displays a level of proficiency that meets the full expectations of the job on a consistent basis. Performance consistently met expectations, and at times possibly exceeded expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good.
- Partially Meets Expectations - Employee displays a level of proficiency that does not meet the full expectations of the job or does not display the expected level of skill on a consistent basis. If the overall review rating averages “Partially Meets Expectations”, a Notice of Improvement Needed form should be given to the employee following the evaluation.
- Fails to Meet Expectations - Performance was consistently below expectations and/or reasonable progress was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas. If the overall review rating averages “Fails to meet Expectations," a Notice of Improvement Needed or a Written Notice is required to be attached in the evaluation. After the evaluation has been completed, the supervisor and the employee will immediately enter a three-month re-evaluation period.
- Make sure the reviewer (supervisor of the person performing the evaluation) has approved the form and you have the employee's assessment fresh in your mind.
- Provide the employee a chance to review the evaluation before meeting.
- Schedule uninterrupted time for discussing the evaluation and ensure privacy.
- Make sure there are no surprises. If feedback during the performance cycle was given, there should be no major surprises.
- Be specific and discuss regular, expected performance. The employee should not have to guess the meaning behind what is said.
- Identify accomplishments above what is expected.
- Discuss any mismatch between goals and achievement.
- Remember...this is the starting point for discussion and should be a two-way communication between supervisor and employee.
- Anticipate possible employee reactions. Address any interfering emotions or disagreements in a calm, supportive manner.
All full-time operational and classified employees who have completed their probationary periods are required to participate in this process
- Probationary employees hired between October 25 and July 24, must have their performance evaluations completed between August 10 and October 24.
- A performance evaluation is not required for probationary employees hired between July 25 and October 24. A supervisor may choose to complete an evaluation.
- ALL probationary employees who have completed six months of the probationary period must have a formal written evaluation made using the Probationary Progress Review [PDF] | [DOC].
Once the meeting has been concluded, the employee will acknowledge and send the evaluation back to the supervisor. The supervisor will check the evaluation to ensure the employee acknowledged the evaluation and send the evaluation to HR via the online system.
Supervisors must have consulted with Employee Relations before the issuance of a Fails to Meet Expectations rating to an employee. An employee who receives a rating of Fails to Meet Expectations must be re-evaluated and have a performance re-evaluation plan developed as outlined below:
Within 10 workdays of the evaluation meeting during which the employee received the annual rating, the employee's supervisor must develop a performance re-evaluation plan that sets forth performance measures for the following three (3) months, and have it approved by the reviewer.
- Even if the employee is in the process of appealing his or her evaluation, the performance re-evaluation plan must be developed. The performance plan/evaluation must clearly indicate that it is a re-evaluation.
- The supervisor should develop an entire performance plan including, “Employee Development.”
- The supervisor must discuss with the employee-specific recommendations for meeting the minimum performance measures contained in the performance re-evaluation plan during the re-evaluation period.
- The employee’s reviewer, and then the employee, should review and sign the performance re-evaluation plan.
- If the employee transfers to another position during the re-evaluation period, the re-evaluation process will be terminated.
NOTE: Regardless of the employee’s movement to another position during this re-evaluation period, the employee will not be eligible for a performance increase.
Three (3) Month Re-Evaluation
The employee must be re-evaluated within approximately two weeks prior to the end of the three (3)-month period. If an employee is absent for more than 14 consecutive days during the three (3)-month re-evaluation period, the period will be extended by the total number of days of absence, including the first 14 days. If the employee receives a re-evaluation rating of “Fails to Meet Expectations,” the supervisor shall demote, reassign, or terminate the employee by the end of the three (3)-month re-evaluation period.
The re-evaluation process does not prevent disciplinary action being taken based on the employee’s poor performance or other reasons stipulated in Policy 1.60, Standards of Conduct, or issuing additional Improvement Needed/Substandard Performance forms.
If an employee disagrees with an evaluation and cannot resolve the disagreement with the supervisor, the employee may appeal in writing to the reviewer within 10 workdays of the initial performance meeting for another review of the evaluation.
The reviewer should discuss an employee’s appeal with the supervisor and employee. After discussion of the appeal, the reviewer should provide the employee with a written response within five (5) workdays of receiving it.
The response should indicate one of the following:
- the reviewer agrees with the evaluation;
- the supervisor will revise the evaluation;
- the supervisor will complete a new evaluation;
- the reviewer will revise the evaluation; or
- the reviewer will complete a new evaluation.
- How to Log into the Employee Portal [PDF]
- Supervisors - How to View my Reviews [PDF]
- Supervisors - How to Create a Classified Plan [PDF]
- Supervisors - How to Create a AP Plan [PDF]
- Supervisors - How to Create an Annual Performance Evaluation for an A/P Employee [PDF]
- Supervisors - How to Create an Annual Performance Evaluation for a Classified Employee [PDF]
- Employees - How to View Reviews [PDF]
- Employees - How to Acknowledge A Plan [PDF]
- A/P Employees - How to do Your Self-Evaluation [PDF]
- Classified Employees - How to do Your Self-Evaluation [PDF]
PeopleAdmin Landing Page Changes
Completing the Performance Plan for the Classified Employee
Classified-Probationary Twelve Month Review
Classified Evaluation Completed by Supervisor
Logging in to your Performance Management Portal
Completing the Performance Plan for the AP Employee
Classified-Probationary Six Month Review
AP Evaluation Completed by Supervisor