hit counter

home | life | tech | ritz | sports | vent | toon | events
E85 Ethanol Grows in Popularity, but it's not the Answer

Michael Conner Tech Manager
Published 04-28-06
Graphic By: Julie Brennan
The seemingly continual trend in skyrocketing gas prices is enticing many consumers to search for alternative fuel options. Several alternative fuels are becoming more practical due to the increased demand, including that from hybrid gas/electric cars, which have surged in popularity. Recently, an alternative made from corn has been sprouting up; this alternative is known as ethanol. Considering all of this hype about the new 'yellow' alternative, is it really all its cracked up to be?

Ethanol is a type of fuel that runs in virtually any type of internal combustion engine, with the proper modifications. Ethanol is produced by fermenting and distilling starch crops that have been broken down into simple sugars. Common crops used to create ethanol include corn, barley and wheat. Corn is the leading ethanol producing crop, but ethanol can also be produced by "cellusosic biomass," or bioethanol, from trees and grasses. E85 ethanol is the most common form of ethanol used for fuel, and it is a mixture of 85 percent corn-based ethanol and 15 percent unleaded gasoline. There are other forms of ethanol in use, such as E10 (10 percent ethanol, 90 percent gasoline), E95 (95 percent ethanol and five percent gasoline) and even E100 (100 percent ethanol), but E85 is the most widespread and available ethanol substance.

This combination reduces a large amount of pollutants and greenhouse gases that normal cars release, and corn-based ethanol (which is the common derivation of ethanol) is a renewable energy source. Widespread use of E85 ethanol also has the potential to reduce our country's dependence on fossil fuels. Brazil and many European countries like Sweden are well on their way to using ethanol as an alternative fuel source.

GM is the leading vehicle manufacturer in the ethanol movement. GM claims to have over 1.5 million E85 ethanol ready vehicles on the road to date, known as FlexFuel vehicles (FFVs), and GM's slogan states "live green, go yellow!" Ford and Daimler-Chrysler also have sizeable lineups of E85 ready vehicles. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, there are over four million FFVs on the road today.

The major benefit of current FFVs is that they can run on either E85 or regular gasoline. This will allow consumers to fill up with E85 where available or use gasoline wherever they cannot locate an E85 gas station. GM states that there are currently over 600 E85 pump stations nationwide. Here is a link that provides a comprehensive list of ethanol gas stations across the U.S.

Current FFVs boast other benefits, such as: increased horsepower, due to the fact that E85 has a higher octane rating than gasoline (E85 ethanol is rated at 110 Octane), less engine wear and the growing support of U.S. agricultural ventures to produce corn. Pricing of E85 at the pumps also runs about 20-30 percent cheaper than gasoline. This is, in part, due to government subsidies and the elimination of state taxes for E85. The U.S. federal tax exemption that keeps ethanol at a competitive price is set to expire in 2007. However, the subsidy may be extended in the near future.

While the benefits are many, ethanol does have its downsides. At the present time, these downsides are significant enough to make a strong case for ethanol to never become a total replacement for gasoline, but rather a helpful transitioning tool to another, more efficient and more economically viable alternative fuel. A study done by Cornell University in 2001 cite multiple economic concerns with using ethanol, and Howstuffworks has a detailed breakdown of the results. The study is a bit dated, but the refining process and the economics of corn and ethanol have not changed significantly in the past few years.

To better understand why ethanol is not currently plausible as a primary fuel source, the economics of corn and the downsides of ethanol need to be taken into consideration. According to the Cornell study, to create one gallon of ethanol, it takes 21.6 pounds of corn, and one acre of land can yield a total of 7,100 pounds of corn. Corn is also grown on a yearly basis, so that equals out to about 328 gallons of corn for every acre grown per year. According to the Department of Energy, the United States currently demands around 9.2 million barrels of oil per day (just for gasoline), and a barrel holds about 42 gallons each, which means that the U.S. demands close to 378 million gallons of gasoline per day. If all cars ran on ethanol, which is not as efficient as gasoline, the U.S. would need around 567 million gallons of ethanol per day. Doing the math, the U.S. would have to grow close to 1.7 million acres of corn per day, or over 630 million acres of corn per year, just to produce enough ethanol to feed the yearly U.S consumption rate. For further comparison, one acre of land is equal to .004 kmē, so the U.S. would need to grow around 2.5 million kmē of corn per year to fuel its thirst. To put this in perspective, the U.S. land surface area is 9,161,923 km2, only a small fraction of which can be farmed for agricultural use.


If you are still skeptical, you can check my math:

Facts:
One gallon of ethanol = 21.6 lbs of corn
The yield of one acre of corn = 7100 lbs of corn
Amount of gasoline that U.S. consumes in one day = 9,200,000 barrels
One barrel can hold 42 gallons
One gallon of gasoline = 1.5 gallons of ethanol
One acre of land = .004 km2
The surface land area of the U.S. = 9,161,923 km2
Arable land in the U.S. 18.01%

Math
One acre of corn production in gallons: 21.6 pounds / 7100 pounds = 328 gallons

U.S. daily consumption in gallons: 9,200,000 barrels / 42 gallons = 378,000,000 gallons

U.S. daily consumption need in ethanol: 378,000,000 gallons of gasoline * 1.5 = 567,000,000 gallons

U.S. corn acreage daily need to produce enough ethanol: 567,000,000 gallons / 328 gallons = 1,700,000 acres

U.S. corn acreage yearly need to produce enough ethanol: 1,700,000 acres * 365 days = 630,000,000 acres

Surface area required to meet the U.S. yearly need of corn to make ethanol: 630,000,000 acres * .004 km2 = 2,520,000 km2

Arable land divided by total land surface in U.S.: 18.01% * 9,161,923 = 1,650,062.33 km2


So once we find enough land fit for cultivation, then the problem of processing and refining comes into consideration. To take corn from the stalk and transform it into a liquid suitable for internal combustion engines, the grain needs to be crushed, processed with various enzymes, mixed with yeast and fermented to make alcohol, and then the alcohol can be distilled to create E85 ethanol. A small amount of gasoline must also be added to the ethanol to make it suitable as a fuel. The problem with this processing is that many of the plants will utilize oil to power the processing. To put it in perspective, here are the Cornell findings:

"The energy economics get worse at the processing plants, where the grain is crushed and fermented. [...] Adding up the energy costs of corn production and its conversion to ethanol, 131,000 BTUs are needed to make 1 gallon of ethanol. One gallon of ethanol has an energy value of only 77,000 BTU. "Put another way," Pimentel says, "about 70 percent more energy is required to produce ethanol than the energy that actually is in ethanol. Every time you make 1 gallon of ethanol, there is a net energy loss of 54,000 BTU."

As stated above, a downside for E85 is its efficiency. For ethanol to match gasoline's efficiency, 1.5 gallons of ethanol are needed to equal one gallon of gasoline. Also, on average, cars running on E85 will see a fuel economy reduction of around 20 percent.

Stored solar energy in gasoline and ethanol is what provides power for their respective uses. For ethanol, as corn grows, it absorbs the suns and stores its inside itself, much like a solar plant does. When it is converted into ethanol, this stored energy is burned. This process is extremely fast in a geologic time scale when compared to gasoline. For gasoline, which is derived from oil, the process takes thousands of years. Oil is formed from compressed and pressurized organic decomposition in the depths of the earth. Over thousands of years, the organic material is put under so much stress and pressure that it eventually transforms into what we know as oil. The process of compaction that oil undergoes produces an energy-rich substance.

Despite the downsides, E85 is looking to become a temporary replacement for gasoline to bridge the gap between current fuels and future possibilities. Consumers who wish to start using E85 don't have to go out and buy a car specifically made to run off of ethanol, they can also modify their current vehicle to run the alternative fuel. The conversion process can cost as little as $400-700 and generally takes under an hour to install. Installation is a fairly simple process, and most consumers will be able to install the necessary hardware themselves. XcelPlus has detailed information on how to tell if your current vehicle can run E85 ethanol and also has a how-to on converting your vehicle to run on E85. These aftermarket conversion kits are not, however, EPA certified, so almost all aftermarket kits are illegal in the U.S. The XcelPlus site states:

"No, FLEXTEK is not EPA certified. Our manufacturer has chosen not to go through the extremely expensive process to get EPA certification. There are many fine aftermarket products, which are not EPA certified. There are over 40,000 FLEXTEK units installed on cars in Brazil. The Brazilians care about their environment as much as we do. If this product was harmful, our manufacturer would have been out of business a long time ago."

E85 ethanol is emerging as a powerful alternative to help stem the current gasoline crisis that many countries around the world find themselves in. Its future as a full gasoline replacement is, however, not feasible.


I'm seeing red.

Post a New Comment
Name: Email:
Subject of your post:
Your Comment:
neat
Posted by brian

nice, good perpsective. It's definently an issue that it's hard to find stations that have e85. perhaps more developed refining processes will help alleviate the massive amount of corn needed. perhaps we will see hybrids using this, so it runs on batteries and e85.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

You know what would be sweet? If the government could royally screw up freemarkets by subsidizing the companies who produce this type of ethanol. By mandating a certain percentage that the gas companies would have to buy, then they could raise our gas prices through the roof. That would be awesome.
Mike ..why are you repeating an outdated study
Posted by Dan M

You said your self it is "dated" . Not one respectable scientist (that isnt paid by the petroleum Petroeum Industry) bothers to quote it because the study was based on 30 year old technolgy. Even as far back as 12 years ago we started seeing a Positive ebnergy gain with Ethanol "Corn ethanol is energy efficient, as indicated by an energy ratio of 1.24, that is, for every Btu dedicated to producing ethanol, there is a 24-percent energy gain. Moreover, producing ethanol from domestic corn stocks achieves a net gain in a more desirable form of energy. Ethanol production utilizes abundant domestic energy supplies of coal and natural gas to convert corn into a premium liquid fuel that can replace petroleum imports by a factor of 7 to 1." http://www.ethanol-gec.org/corn_eth.htm There are 11 studies showing a positive net energy of Ethanol on only 2 Negatives 3 of which are Pimentals ! And not one of our Americans Kids had to lose their lives to "protect our oil interests" That fact alone makes Ethanol a viable option for many Americans. Ethanol is not a total soultion it is an ALTERNATIVE ..and ALternative that is available today and that is inexpensive option for most Americans to use . Hybrids Cars are great but are still far to expensive to make them a priocing alternative. True electric and Hydrogen vehicles are still decades in the future . Ethanol is now and that's what makes it a viable option . The Auto manufacturers are working on increasing MPG on ethanol vehilces and that will happen , in the meantime the consumer also has options to increase their fuel economy as I have done here http://e85vehicles.com/converting-e85.htm Instead of waiting for some holy fuel energy grail many Americans have already said enough to the Oil Companies .. Many Americans have already stopped contributing to OPEC and well continue to demonstrate that to a person you dont have to be held hostage by the Oil Companies . Ethanol is a part of the overall diversification solution that lowers our dependence on Oil ..and that certainly does make it a part of the "Answer"
saying the same thing
Posted by Michael Conner

Isn't that what I said in the article? E85 is not THE answer, but an alernative, and be helpful in lifting our country off its petroleum dependence. Also, like I said, I am making a case for E85 to not become a total replacemenet for gasoline, but rather an alternative. So, you are basically just repeating what I am sayinig.

People can't go out buying an E85 capable car believing they have a total alternative for gasoline, this is simply not the case.

Furthermore, Most people are not aware of the downsides of E85, so knowing what they are, they will be in a better position to understand what E85 is and why it will be great to help get rid of our dependence on oil, and not THE answer. This point, however, is not being expressed to the massses by ethanol supporting companies. Our country is too quick to make conclusions on alternative fuels, they need to be used and we need to replace oil as a source of fuel, but a multitude of alternatives need to be used; no one is the magical fix.

Also, I said dated in the meaning that it is not a couple months old. Seeing as the study is still only a few years old, and the fact that the study was done by Cornell University, not the petroleum industy, and the fact that the technology has not changed THAT much, the study still stands. Also, I highly doubt every new facilty and farm will be using the very best technology in producing ethanol, so studies using older technology are MUCH more realistic.

I believe you may have a more biased opinion about ethanol since you are part of the E85 movement, just like the opposite side has, which you pointed out; like the oil industry holding hostage the American people. So you are welcome to your opinion, of course, but independent studies and research are where the REAL answers are found, with no biased backing.

Also, did you look at the date of the study you linked in your post? 1995? It is much more dated than the Cornell study. This being the case, that study is MUCH more dated.... so your post of pointing out my use of an 'outdated' study is crazy since you are linking an even more 'outdated' study.

And protect our oil interests? Please. I had no political references in my article, and I did not receive a check from President Bush or Exxon to negate E85; I am not even negating it, I am showing BOTH sides. I researched the subject and the numbers are there. I have a brother in the military, so I know the risks that they take. So do not try and play the patriotic card in trying to somehow negate my article, although, in the end, you are saying exactly what I am saying: E85 will be a great alternative, but it is not THE answer.

Acreage...
Posted by Larry Gude

You show: 'U.S. corn acreage yearly need to produce enough ethanol: 1,700,000 acres * 365 days = 630,000,000 acres" and go on to state we need 5 earths per year yet every thing I can find shows total US farm land as around 900,000,000 acres You post 1 acre = to 4 sq. km. My math shows it is .004 sq km. In other words, we can replace ALL of our gasoline needs with ethanol in terms of acreage needed. Obviously, we can't just eliminate what is on those 600 million acres now but, we don't need no 5 earths nither. In any event, improvments in irrigtation and other farming techniques may yield enough room to at least make a serious dent.
acreage conversion
Posted by mm

Yes, your acreage conversion is wrong. One acre of land = 0.004046856422 km According to the CIA World Fact Book, The land area of the United States is 9,631,420 sq km. Divide this number by .0040... and the result is ~2,380,008,895 acres of land. Arable land accounts for about 18% of this according to the same source or about 428,401,601 acres. Of course, all arable land cannot be used, since you and I are probably living on some of it. The actual land available in the U.S. still appears to fall well short of the 630,000,000 acres stated in your article, but not quite as bad as the equivalent of ~5 Earths.
No Subject
Posted by Michael Conner

Thanks guys, I realized the mistake a few weeks ago as well, but there was an issue with the password change on the server, so I was not able to login and make the necessary changes until now.
Good article
Posted by Jeremy

I am really for pushing a greater use of E85 so I liked hearing the reasons why it is not 100% feasible. I think your most important point is that it is an "alternative." Obiviously my biggest current hangup is our dependence on oil, specifically foreign oil. I can tolerate, to a degree, the current price level, but it is the uncertainty and continuos price fluctation for a good that is not so much a luxury as it is a necessity that irritates me. Having a comparable and accesible alternative, such as E85, will help lessen our depedence on normal gasoline at the pump. If we all had the option to choose what we wanted in our vehicle (choice being driven by price) simple economics would dictate a lowering of the prices, until it reached the price floor. Of course my explanation is quite simplified. We as Americans need to convince ourselves that it is not a bright idea to wait until our hand is forced by a crisis in oil supply. Yes we need to sacrifice some until alternative fuels are more feasible. But waiting until they are 100% better than current options may be a bad idea. Could you imagine what would happen to the country if our oil supplies were cut off? Now I don't know how we can work around the shortage of farmable land thing. But that like the poorer fuel effeciency are things that I am confident our engineers and others can improve upon with time. I think a greater national demand to use E85 would help drive those improvements as well as the discovery of a more permanent and feasible energy source. Bottom line, we need to stop waiting till it hurts before we seek help. Nice article and good comments. Thanks.
No Subject
Posted by qulema

Inside Whim
Visit Our Sponsors