Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 13:54:59 -0700 This was taken from MIT's Course Evaluation Guide, Fall, 1991 The Best and Worst Comments Received: * Text is useless. I use it to kill roaches in my room. * He teaches like Speedy Gonzalez on a caffeine high. * In class, the syllabus is more important than you are. * Help! I've fallen asleep and I can't wake up! * Text makes a satisfying 'thud' when dropped on the floor. * The class is worthwhile because I need it for the degree. * His blackboard technique puts Rembrandt to shame. * Textbook is confusing . . . someone with a knowledge of English should proofread it. * Have you ever fallen asleep in one class and awakened in another? That's the way I felt all term. * This class was a religious experience for me . . . I had to take it all on faith. * The recitation instructor would make a good parking lot attendant. Tries to tell you where to go, but you can never understand him. * Problems sets are a decoy to lure you away from potential exam material. * Recitation was great. It was so confusing that I forgot who I was, where I was, and what I was doing -- It's a great stress reliever. * He is one of the best teachers I have had . . . He is well-organized, presents good lectures, and creates interest in the subject. I hope my comments don't hurt his chances of getting tenure. * I would sit in class and stare out the window at the squirrels. They've got a cool nest in the tree. * The absolute value of the TA was less than epsilon. * TA steadily improved throughout the course... I think he started drinking and it really loosened him up. * Information was presented like a ruptured fire hose -- spraying in all directions -- no way to stop it. * I never bought the text. My $60 was better spent on the Led Zeppelin tapes that I used while doing the problem sets. * What's the quality of the text? 'Text is printed on high quality paper.' * The course was very thorough. What wasn't covered in class was covered on the final exam.