nextupprevious
Next:About this document Up:No TitlePrevious:No Title

Sharp Corners and Vertical Tangents

When f is defined at x=c but tex2html_wrap_inline69 is undefined, we would expect f to have a sharp corner or a vertical tangent at x=c. We know from previous discussion that the sharp corner is important because it could create a max or a min for f. Let's use examples to demonstrate these.

Example 1: Let tex2html_wrap_inline77

(1) First, we rewrite tex2html_wrap_inline79 and find tex2html_wrap_inline81 So the critical number for f is at x=2. When x>2, tex2html_wrap_inline89 so f is increasing in tex2html_wrap_inline93 When tex2html_wrap_inline95 so f is decreasing in tex2html_wrap_inline99 We would expect f to have a minimum at x=2. Since f(2)=1, the minimum point for f is (2,1).

(2) We note that tex2html_wrap_inline111 is undefined (and f(2) is defined) so we expect to have a sharp corner or a vertical tangent at x=2. But vertical tangent is impossible, since we already see that f has a min. at x=2. So, it has to be a sharp corner. Pay attention to the following two questions which are related to the slope of the tangent at x=2.

(3) What is tex2html_wrap_inline123 (If you know there is a sharp corner and min. at x=2, you could guess the answer to this already). Let's evaluate the limit, tex2html_wrap_inline127 (you plug in x=2.0001), you see the denominator is small, and the fraction is posititive, so you get tex2html_wrap_inline131

(4) What is tex2html_wrap_inline133 Try this for yourself, you should get tex2html_wrap_inline135

(5) Can you finish the graph? Use plot(((x-2)^(2/3)) + 1,x=-2..4, thickness=3); and use Maple Software to verify your answer, but be cautious, the graph you obtain from Maple is not accurate, because most of computer algebra systems, they have trouble to plot odd root functions. They treat them like even root functions.

(6) Use tex2html_wrap_inline137 to find the intervals where f is convave upward and downward, from our graph and analysis, we should see that f is concave downward in tex2html_wrap_inline143 Let's see if we get consistent information from tex2html_wrap_inline145 Well, since tex2html_wrap_inline147 we see that denomator is always positive so the whole fr action is always negative, which implies that f is always concave down.

Example 2: Let tex2html_wrap_inline151. Investigate tex2html_wrap_inline153 max/min, concave upward/downward, sharp corner or v ertical tangent and graph the function.

(1) First, tex2html_wrap_inline155 and tex2html_wrap_inline157 Note that tex2html_wrap_inline159 is always positive, so f is always increasing, no max or min.

(2) We note that tex2html_wrap_inline163 is undefined but f(-5) is defined (=0), we expect to have a vertical tangent at x=-5 (will not be a sharp corner because we should not have max or min.) Can you guess what tex2html_wrap_inline169 and tex2html_wrap_inline171

(3)tex2html_wrap_inline173 (Verify).

(4) Since tex2html_wrap_inline175 when x<-5, tex2html_wrap_inline179 so f is concave upward in tex2html_wrap_inline183 When x>-5, tex2html_wrap_inline187 so f is concave downward in (-5, tex2html_wrap_inline193

(5) Use plot(4*((x+5)^(3/5)) + 1,x=-2..7, thickness=3); Notice that Maple gives a wrong graph for this problem, do you know why?


nextupprevious
Next:About this document Up:No TitlePrevious:No Title