|
|
Post a New Comment
No Subject Posted by Andrew Lent Ok, we just averted a weird issue where comments were overwriting articles. Everything should be ok now and comments all over the site can now be made. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE notify me at whim@radford.edu if you happen to notice something get overwritten by a comment.
Thank you, enjoy Whim this week! No Subject Posted by David Thumbs up. (not your butt) No Subject Posted by markee In the immortal words of Arthur Fonzarelli "Correct-a-mundo" No Subject Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader It WILL be nice when Whim things go back to normal again. And arguing with these morons is like beating a dead horse, so I really wonder why people get so worked up about it. It's not like the Republican branch of Whim writers have any power to do anything anyway. They're not CONVERTING liberals, for Christ sake. And NOTHING you say will make them see the truth...so please...stop the insanity. Like Steve said: Just stop encouraging them...stop writing and stop feeding the fire. They're idiots...you won't win. No Subject Posted by Ray Is it fair that this only characterizes the Conservatives as the stubborn uneducated ones? We see y'all in the same regard, as thickheaded and stuck in your ways. No, there is no way that we can convert any of you to our side, our only hope is that we can convince you to take a step back and see the topic from ourside. I'm not going to say that you, the socialist, are close minded, and unlike us, can not even begin to comprehend the others' arguments, but I just said it. No Subject Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader Ray, do you honestly take yourself seriously? You're a joke in the eyes of most anyone who frequents Whim, I'm guessing, and of the Christian conservative Tri-force here, you're the one who comes off as a moron in nearly every post you make. Come off it. No Subject Posted by Andrew Lent Ok, I found the Christian conservative Tri-force comment to be utterly hilarious. hmmm Posted by Joe Just out of curiosity, hasn't Whim viewership increased by thousands since those "Nazis" you talk about came to Whim. How is it fair or kind for you to treat them the same way you accuse them of treating other people? "Nazis?" Posted by Rick Snee While I may not agree with the writers you mention, I find the term "nazi" in poor taste. Why trivialize the group responsible for one of the worst atrocities in human history by applying it to them? Besides, wouldn't your namecalling and the fact you made an entry about them counter the arguement you're making? I may not always like what they have to say, but that's the beauty of this magazine and the comments section. No Subject Posted by Steve I agree that the term "Nazi" wasn't used in greatest of taste, but I it is true that the "Chrstian Conservative Tri-Force" has said some far worse things in their articles. I didn't write this article for anyone to completely overthink it, I think really that's what I'm attacking. I felt like the only reason that discussions were starting on Whim was because people wanted to have political debates, and honestly I was simply feeling left out. I felt left out because I continued to write articles that I put effort into, but no one could care less because they were all too busy bickering with one another. ? Posted by Patrick "I'm not going to say that you, the socialist, are close minded, and unlike us, can not even begin to comprehend the others' arguments, but I just said it." ::blink::
I don't think Cracker Jack makes a Decoder Ring for this particular passage. Anyone want to translate it into something that makes more sense than it does now? No Subject Posted by Andrew Lent I'd say the problem wasn't that people were ignoring you, Steve (cause I was still reading your articles), but it was the fact that no one really commented on articles until there was something to debate about. Before there might have been a few comments on an article here or there, but once the readership became polarized, comments couldn't be held back.
Keep writing, Steve, everyone needs a break from the really intense stuff. I dislike a section that isn't diverse! No Subject Posted by Peter "I'm not going to say that you, the socialist, are close minded, and unlike us, can not even begin to comprehend the others' arguments, but I just said it." I don't think Cracker Jack makes a Decoder Ring for this particular passage. Anyone want to translate it into something that makes more sense than it does now? A simple Decoder Ring isn't going to handle this one. I think we'll need a team of experts fluent in Moronese to translate this one. ;) No Subject Posted by Steve You make a good point Andrew and I agree with you. Thank you for reading my articles and keeping together a totally awesome internet magazine. Steve pricks hearts in the bushes of beers Posted by Heidi But do bats eat cats? No Subject Posted by Bree No matter how long idiots blather on, people will always need the funny in their life, and that funny is you my dear. No Subject Posted by Ray Sorry, it was confusing now that I reread it. Basically I am saying that you can't see our point of view. We see yours sometimes, but find it truly amazing how asanine some of your ideas are. You dont even seem to be able to comprehend our side of the argument, and that is why there is rarely an argument and you resort to name calling. I am not saying agree with everything I have to say, but merely understand where I am coming from. Dont dismiss it right off the bat because you can't practice what you preach and remain open minded through a paragraph just because it may contain something you dont agree with. No Subject Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader You say "you" alot, but how many debates has Steve been involved in with you? No Subject Posted by Peter You dont even seem to be able to comprehend our side of the argument, and that is why there is rarely an argument and you resort to name calling. Ummm, correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you the one that used the terms "raghead" and "towelhead" and other such phrases in some recent posts? No Subject Posted by Jim Lawson Where is Erskine in all of this? God help you when and if he reads this one. No Subject Posted by Ray Still need clarification I see. Rarely, if ever, will you see me straight out call someone a d-bag as Rick did in another article. I use slurs like that when I am generalizing something, usually when I dont agree. However, you will be hard pressed to find me attacking someone specifically like is done constantly to me. Now dont get me wrong, I'm not crying about it. I truly dont care if people on here dont like me. I use my article and attacks on me because I can speak for them and there is proof 2 clicks away. However, I am just saying many times people resort to attacking the person writing the post and not the substance itself. Really, I'm not trying to be contraversial, I dont care why people do it, I am just pointing out a fact that I seriously doubt anyone can refute. No Subject Posted by Peter I use slurs like that when I am generalizing something, usually when I dont agree. Here's the thing: the use of slurs in any kind of argument severely cheapens it. You can't expect people to take you seriously when all they see is words like "towelhead" and "faggot" and the such. Maybe one of the reasons "we" can't see it your way is because of the way it's presented. No Subject Posted by THE Blake, who apparently is a Nazi according to Steve "And it's obvious that you don't agree with these Nazi--or excuse me "conservative"--articles." "neo-fascist articles" Communist. Socialist. Anti-American. Bleeding Heart. Knee-Jerker. We can all play the name-calling game, Steve. No Subject Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader Umm, yeah, Blake...those aren't all synonymous with each other. Aren't you a political science major? Why don't you go ask a professor to explain the differences to you. Do you want to bring back McCarthyism? No Subject Posted by THE Blake "Umm, yeah, Blake...those aren't all synonymous with each other." Sure they are. They all describe the Democratic party, partially if not fully. Contact Info: befought@radford.edu http://blog.myspace.com/bburgblake1 No Subject Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader Eh, no. Or, if you want to play ball that way... RACIST. GREEDY. HYPOCRITICAL. There, those all describe the Republican Party. No Subject Posted by Ray Sure they are and here is why: Communist=I prefer socialist, but essentially on paper socialism and communism are the same. No Subject Posted by stella k I'm with Steve! Boycott the Politics! Hello, Pot. Posted by Rick Snee Bleeding Heart. You guys are relentless. Once you get on your path, no matter how wrong you will be proven, you want to hear what is going to support your narrowmindedness. You only have about 3 comments you post on here over and over again. No Subject Posted by Steve Sorry I haven't responded to any of the stuff you guys wrote, but this is what I have to say. I agree that the name calling was childish, I'm sorry about that, but it is true that at times some of you have said some pretty awful things. That's not the point however. The point is that I was making a comment on how it seems that all Whim has become is a political debate board. Although these articles are good because they get people talking I miss articles that were light hearted and more of a laugh. Don't worry, you can expect to not see me writing too much more like this. your pal, "Socialist"(which I don't think is such a bad thing) Steve That point is good No Subject Posted by Andrew Lent We do need more humor, but you know what, we only get it when the light-hearted humorous people submit. I know Zoe and I crave seeing more in Vent than purely religious and political articles, but they defintiely have their place too. So, that being said, please keep submitting Steve, get your friends to submit, get total strangers to submit.
No Subject Posted by THE Blake "(which I don't think is such a bad thing)" ...and that's sad. No Subject Posted by THE Blake "I know Zoe and I crave seeing more in Vent than purely religious and political articles, but they defintiely have their place too." ...for example? No Subject Posted by Steve "(which I don't think is such a bad thing)" ...and that's sad. *sigh* |
Inside Whim
Visit Our Sponsors
|