Staff
Writer

Michael Joseph
Beall

 

 

 

Radford's Flooding Frenzy of 2003
Michael Beall | Guest Writer | Published 12/12/03

Graphic By: Baudi Ratcliffe-Hollins

I understand that water does travel at stunning speeds, which at times can catch people off guard. However considering Radford has a history of flooding, administrators should have taken more actions and preparation to prevent the loss of vehicles in Lot Z.

In the 22 years that Lot Z has been open, there has never been a more damaging flood than the one that hit on Nov. 19. Other floods have washed over Lot Z in the past, but proper notification was given so that vehicles could be moved. However this was overlooked and created devastating results.

Over 73 cars were declared totaled from this natural disaster, making many students "car-less." Preparation for possible future flooding should be taken seriously for this specific reason. Along with the devastation and timing of this occurrence, many families are suffering from significant costs prior to upcoming holidays.

From word of mouth across the Radford community, it is clear there are many different attitudes toward the flooding of Lot Z. I understand that we can not always physically control the powers of Mother Nature, but we can prepare and set up programs, such as presentations for how to deal with catastrophes of this nature. Many feel that Radford University is not at fault, because they aren't a sewer or flood company. They continue to stress that nature is unpredictable and can't be controlled at all times.

Radford has prior experiences with the nearby Claytor Lake Dam, which periodically releases water into the New River. This river is one that is located parallel to Lot Z. At the time of these releases, the American Electric Power Company communicates with Radford Police and declares how much water will be dumped into the New River.

I find no excuse in not properly notifying students of the current action taking place. Never once did the RA's huddle up a hall meeting or express a concern of possible problems. Around 6 p.m. Radford Police contacted the Director of Residential Life, notifying him of a possible rise in water behavior due to the release. Word may have gotten out earlier; however due to the high population of students, it wasn't circulated soon enough.

Around 10:15 p.m. a student noticed floating cars, and the word finally got out. Many students had night classes making them unaware of the whole thing. I don't recall hearing any buildings being told to notify students. Meanwhile, Radford Police started to gather up decal numbers and then began to notify students directly. By that time Lot Z was practically submerged underwater.

I find not only Radford Police and Radford University at fault but also the Director of Residential Life. He should have called each RD of the various buildings to make others aware of the situation. If this has been an issue for 22 years, then there should be a prior flood plan ready for deployment. The delays and miscommunications between students and high staff made the flood of 2003 for Lot Z a costly and horrific event to be remembered in the surrounding community of Radford, Va.

I think 22 years is adequate time to develop a plan to efficiently notify students or to stop continuous events of flooding. I have heard that this was the worse flood since the opening of Lot Z. I feel that after the very first flood there should have been future planning made to support and communicate with the entire campus in a timely manner.

After the flooding, I sense a feeling of carelessness in the hands of administrators and directors. There were plenty of opportunities to contact the students of possible destruction. After being notified of water releasing, the Radford Police should have executed a decal examination and should have immediately contacted students. Radford was unprepared and did a horrible job of communicating with students.

Also the American Electric Power Company notified the University, like it always does. However the school did not notify students but rather sent the police as the middle-man. At the same time, students began to notice the water rising and spread the news by word of mouth. Many ran out their dorm rooms to Lot Z, only to find their cars in five feet of muddy flowing water. Also the police blocked off the area, which prevented students from moving their vehicles. Radford University is responsible for this. They should not have allowed any more cars to be damaged.

Floods are not always physically controllable, but damaged be suppressed through proper tactics and decisive planning. My advice is to re-evaluate the planning for this situation and make yearly assessments of the plan.
___
Michael wants to be "Van Wilder."


Send this Article to a Friend



What do you think?
Leave your comments below.
Name:     E-Mail:

 Year:      Major:

Comments:

By clicking on "Submit," you assert that you are who you represent to be and your comments abide by section 20 of Radford's Student Handbook (for RU students), and by the Virginia State and Federal laws including but not limited to libel, copyright law, and invasion of privacy. The comments posted on this site are not necessarily representative of the views of Radford University, its administration, faculty, staff or all of its students. For more information, read our policy on feedback fora.


Responses:
Refresh frame to view latest entries.

 

Advertise - Awards - Legal
© Whim Internet Magazine 2003