Just A Few Good Beers: Justice or Overkill?
  Mike Flick | Copy Editor

View Feedback | Send this Article | Published 2/28/03



Graphic By: Brandon Faust

Eight years? I was shocked to hear of such a lengthy prison sentence. Many manslaughter charges don't even get eight years, and the only thing these parents did was serve alcohol to a large group of kids. Come on! Even though Charlottesville is the home of the University of Virginia, I realized the city was still small enough that a case like this was going to create an enormous amount of feedback and gossip. So, I decided to do some more research. I found that, like anything else, there are two sides to this story.

The Robinsons were a typical American family. Lisa Robinson volunteered at their children's school and was known in the community as a very responsible parent. Neither of them had a prior criminal history. This just appears to be a "goof-up" by the Robinsons. But how big? Three hundred and sixty dollars worth of alcohol served to an estimated 60 to 80 teenagers is extreme. The prosecution proved that Lisa Robinson did not tell other parents that alcohol was being served, and provided the damaging evidence that she supposedly told the teenagers to drink vinegar to cover up the smell of alcohol once the police arrived. This made me really question the Robinsons' responsibility in the whole matter.

Currently, the laws in Virginia state that being charged with contributing to the delinqency of a minor is punishable with up to 12 months in jail and/or a $2500 fine. Lawrence Wren, George Robinson's attorney, was quoted as saying,"Historically, it didn't matter whether one was charged with 16 warrants or one. That's because no one had ever been sentenced to 12 months in jail on one count...It was unimaginable that the punishment for an adult giving alcohol to a minor, whether one count or 10, could put someone in jail for 12 months." The judge in this case, Judge Dwight D. Johnson, was known to be conservative and fairly lenient in his decision making. Wren continued on to say that, "In that court, a 30-day jail sentence would be harsh."

Another aspect to the case that does not help the Robinsons was the death of 16-year-old Brittany Bishop one month before the Robinson party. Brittany Bishop was a popular Albemarle County high schooler who died in a car accident after leaving a party where alcohol was served. Her death deeply affected the community. Lisa Robinson and Bishop's mother were good friends before the incident at the Robinsons'.

Lately, the conviction of the Robinsons has been supported by this issue. The fact that they were very irresponsible and handed out alcohol to minors, and the potential hazard these teenagers could have faced if they drove home, strikes a sensitive chord in the community. But what about their son? This boy, at the age of 16, is without his mother and father for the next eight years. It would hit me extremely hard if I was forced to live without my parents for eight years. As with any case of such magnitude, an appeal from the Robinsons can be expected.

I almost forgot to mention my encounter with Judge Johnson. This Whim staffer first faced him in the summer of 2001 when I was charged with reckless driving in Scottsville, Virginia, by a very "direct" female police officer (go figure). Just to let you know, the judges in Virginia tend to be very "hard-line," so my court date was making me very nervous. To my delight, Judge Johnson just fined me and sent me to driving school; no suspended license, no extreme lecture, no book. So you can see how this case with the Robinsons came as a surprise to me. I would stupidly make the same mistakes and have "altercations" with the state of Virginia, so maybe Judge Johnson did not punish me hard enough. The question right now is whether or not his decision with the Robinsons will set a precedent by severely limiting parent-guided teenage drinking, or instead just go down my road?

Please let me know your opinions on this case!


Responses:
Refresh frame to view latest entries.


Name: Tonia
Year: freshman
Comments:
I agree with Michael. The Judge was too harsh, but at the same time the parents were stupid to buy the liquor. The kids would probably drink anything that was free at the party...liquor or not. I'd like to see them do community service.

Name: Nick
Comments:
Ridiculous indeed. And God, don't stop giving him a hard time! Did I say I wanted you to stop? no no no, don't do that. THen I might have to start giving him a hard time, and your authority is much greater than mine...

Name: Brian Kaufman
Year: Freshman
Major: ITEC
Comments:
8 Years?! There better be an appeal or something, that is beyond extreme. The laws here are messed up. How can someone kill another person, or rob a bank and get less time? Just rediculous...

Name: 1 Fast Civic Si
Major: Goin Faster then You
Comments:
lets not forget about those speeding laws in virginia 100 in a 55 is NOT that fast damn you Virginia State Police

Name: Mike Flick
Comments:
Thanks for the comments so far, everyone. Just to clarify a few things, the above article I meant that I would continue to get in violations of the law post-judge johnson(but they were just traffic and stuff here at RU, natch). The question I asked at the end was asking if the court decision on the Robinsons would severely affect the way adults tend to "slip" alcohol to their children or will the decision just go my way road(meaning continuing to do what I do) and parents will STILL continue to give alcohol to their children. You with me? I tend to write fast sometimes so if you have a question about an article then let me know! Also, "God" below is one of my best friends here at RU, and he's just giving me the usual hard time. I love the fact that he's a friend who actually reads my article and forms sometime type of opinion...uh sorta! One last thing--if I didn't make it clear, I think Johnson's ruling was way too harsh and the Robinsons should get 90 days + community service(maybe with MADD?) instead. Eight years is ridiculous. If they had a criminal prior then maybe i'd understand but they really don't...don't deprive a kid their parents for 8 years on this charge. Thanks everyone and I encourage more opinions--positive, negative, hell anything!

Name: Wintermute
Comments:
Who said God was the answer?

Name: Nick
Comments:
And as always, wonderful article Mike. I would very much like to see you writing for Vent on a regular basis.

Name: Nick
Comments:
I am starting to see a soon-to-be annoying trend here with this whole "(article subject here) is not the answer" thing. But we know all about you God, we know where you live too!

Name: God
Year: 00
Major: Godology
Comments:
Hello Mike, we meet again. Ah, yes, a most interesting article, with many sides, as you put it. But remember Mike, alcohol is not always the answer. I am God after all.

Life Section Tech Section Ritz Section Vent Section Sports Section Toon Section Play Section Season 13 Whim Home Whim Archive About Us Join our Staff Subscribe/Read our Newsletter Search Whim Submit Your Article Meet our Staff Submit Your Article Whim Policies Whim Policies