TV Review: Enterprise, Season Two
Shaun Corley | Staff Writer
What do time travelers from the 31st century, a West Virginia mining
town in the 50’s, Romulans, and a killer space station have in common?
They’re the subject of the first four episodes of "Enterprise’s" second
season. Once again, the show is off to a strong start, with high-quality
stories that strike a perfect blend of action and character development.
Some of "Enterprise’s" success can be attributed to John Shiban,
late of "The X-files", who joined the staff as co-executive producer.
Also, the writing staff seems to have listened to fan’s complaints about the
show. For example, in “Shockwave II,” the season premiere, the Enterprise’s
crew is taken to task by the Vulcans and Starfleet for mistakes made during
their first year. Fans were quick to cite the crews’ mishandling of
situations as a sign of incompetence. Many complained that Captain Archer
(Scott Bakula) wasn’t tough and assertive enough, and the writers have
responded by toughening the captain up. Sub-commander T’pol (Jolene Blalock)
is beginning to become more sympathetic towards her human colleagues, and
growing more skeptical of her Vulcan superiors.
Another factor behind "Enterprise’s" recent burst of greatness is
continuity, an important aspect of any show, particularly one belonging to the
Star Trek franchise. The Romulans made their first appearance in “Minefield,”
the third episode of the season. An episode of the classic "Star
Trek, A Balance of Terror,” established that, prior to that episode, no
human or ally had seen a Romulan face-to-face. In “Minefield,” no one on
board the Enterprise saw a Romulan, thus preserving continuity. Hopefully,
the producers and writers will adhere to this in future episodes. A common
complaint about "Voyager" was the lack of continuity between episodes.
The creative staff of "Enterprise" are working to remedy this problem.
The ship sustained heavy damage in “Minefield.” Rather than showing the ship
fully repaired and functional in the next episode, “Dead Stop,” the producers
opted to show the ship being repaired. At the same time, they were able to
tell an awesome story.
"Enterprise’s" first season was decent. There were some stunning
episodes, along with some sub-par ones. This writer is hoping that the
creative team will learn from their mistakes and work to make this already
excellent show even better.
Name: b.faust
Comments:
I think you should write an article or two (or three!) for Ritz, Natalia. ;-) Thanks for the article Shaun!
Name: Natalia Denda
Comments:
I dunno.. I think personally that Enterprise has lost some of the that 'Star Trekiness' to it. It reminds me more of some other sci-fi shows such as Final Contact and Far Scape. Star Trek always had a specific ring to it.. kind of like when you flip the channel you know its Star Trek when you see it. I think everyone in the civilized world can recognize a star trek uniform.. the uniforms of Enerprise are more like G-suits worn by fighter pilots then anything else. Yes Enterprise does try extremely hard to fit in with the other 4 ST's but its just not the same. I was suprised when I heard that the producers were going back in time with a series, instead of forward. Perhaps they got ahead of themselves with Cpt. Jack (I think was his name), in Voyager when they went back to the 20th century LA with the 29th century technology.
|