
SAFETY
FIRST
Cost concerns the chief reason why safety innovations
arenÕt prominent at lower levels
JW Martin
ItÕs
what every fan pays to see and what every driver prays to avoid. Mistakes are
its precursor and plums of smoke and silence are classic symptoms of its
existence. In the aftermath jangled wads of sheetmetal
and puddles of oil and despair intertwine with the raving cheers of an excited
crowd.
This
is the essence of a crash- a racing incident that can spark a myriad of
feelings and hatch instant controversy between those involved and those
gathered. Left in its wake are as many different viewpoints and opinions as there
are people present.
But
while there are many different factors to a crash, as well as many different
outcomes, driver safety reigns as the common denominator and theme paramount to
such an event.
The
concern of driver safety has become a staple conversation piece in the NASCAR
community. The recent upswing in deaths attributed to on-track accidents around
the turn of the century – including that of racing legend Dale Earnhardt
– has led the sport to take a more proactive role in insuring the health
of drivers throughout every sanctioning division in NASCAR. Safety innovations
and advancements are widespread and are included in every facet of the sport
today.
Designed
in the 1980Õs by Dr. Robert Hubbard, the HANS (Head and Neck Support) device
has become the most acclaimed safety instrument in the garage area. Celebrated
by critics and advocates alike, and worn by drivers in every division of motor
racing in the United States, the device has become the most noticeable safety
feature in racing to date.
Constructed
primarily of carbon-fiber, the HANS device is designed to eliminate the
ÔwhiplashÕ effect a driver experiences in an accident, thereby reducing head
and neck injuries. The device is fastened only to the helmet of the driver and
works in tandem with the seatbelts to reduce the velocity of the impact. It
transfers the energy away from the head while keeping the entire body properly
positioned.
This
particular blueprint has become the premier head and neck restraint system
throughout the country, replacing the elder Hutchens device as the only mandated
NASCAR sanctioned apparatus of its kind.
Safety
innovations are not restricted to the cockpits of racecars, however. Lining the
retaining fences of many major racing venues today is a steel and foam paradox:
soft walls. While the SAFER (Steel and Foam Energy Reduction) barrier -the
official name given to the technology- is far from soft; its implementation is
designed to reduce the impact sustained by a racecar upon contact with the
wall.
The
brainchild of Dean Sicking and a team of engineers
from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the SAFER Barrier is nothing more than
an appendage of a pre-existing wall. Steel tubes form the outer barricade while
a series of strategically placed polystyrene foam blocks wedge between the pair
of walls, aiding in support.
While
Ôsoft wallsÕ come in many styles, the theory is the same: reducing impact by
displacing the kinetic energy released when a car hits the wall.
These
are just two of the more prominent safety innovations that have become
fundamental aspects of the racing macrocosm, and are seen weekly during NASCAR
truck, Nationwide and Sprint Cup events.
But,
at the lower levels these advancements-and others aimed at driver health, are
not as prominent. SAFER Barriers are nonexistent at the majority of tracks
licensed by NASCAR, and although the HANS device is mandated in most levels of
NASCAR competition, the device is not mandated in the WHELEN All- American
Series.
Perhaps
the biggest factor to blame for the absence of these innovations is, quite
simply, money.
The
cost to implement the SAFER Barrier around a racetrack ranges anywhere from $800,000
to well over $1 million, depending on the length of the speedway. Compounding
the fact is that the tracks themselves must foot the bill, without any monetary
assistance from NASCAR.
The
capital to fund such a colossal undertaking is a concern of many speedway
administrators, including Randy Merriman, director of competition at Motor Mile
Speedway.
ÒItÕs
something we have talked about doing, but itÕs extremely expensive,Ó explains
Merriman. ÒBut, then again, you donÕt need to put a price on someoneÕs safety.Ó
At
a base-level cost of $695, the HANS device doesnÕt come cheap. And with nothing
to help offset the cost, drivers must pay out-of-pocket for the increased
protection a HANS device affords. Money, again, is the
reason such an exceptional safety feature is uncommon at local tracks.
It
is this growing disparity between the upper and lower divisions in NASCAR that
has led many to wonder if more can be done for those drivers competing in lower
divisions such as the WHELEN All-American Series. Ultimately, it comes down to
the NASCAR hierarchy; what the guys at the top are willing to do for the guys
at the bottom.
But
the director of competition at Motor Mile Speedway is quick to point out
changes have been made to increase driver safety and believes more changes for
the betterment of drivers is on the horizon.
ÒThis
year NASCAR has mandated for the late model stock class an eighth-inch steel
plate to go in the driverÕs door to keep protruding objects from going through the
roll bars and getting to the driver,Ó Merriman says.
Other
minor changes have been made to the rule book this year, and Merriman thinks
the SAFER Barrier system could find its way to MMS sometime in the future. And
as far as NASCAR mandating the HANS device in the lower tiers of competition?
ÒItÕs
coming. I have a feeling itÕs coming right around the corner.Ó