A Strategic Plan for Developing Web-Enhanced Courses: A Faculty Proposal*

Dennis Cogswell, School of Social Work
Bruce Mahin, Department of Music
George Santopietro, Department of Economics
Robert Sheehy, Department of Biology
James Unnever, Department of Sociology/Anthropology
Susan Woodward, Department of Geography

 

* The content of this document reflects the deliberations of the ad hoc CyberUniversity Instructional Design Committee. Committee members include William Cobb, Dr. Karma Castleberry, Dr. Dennis Cogswell, Lorraine Durrill, Steve Helms, Dr. Bruce Mahin, Dr. George Santopietro, Dr. Robert Sheehy, Dr. Lee Stewart, Dr. James Unnever, and Dr. Susan Woodward. Drs. James Unnever and Susan Woodward are committee co-chairs.

 

INTRODUCTION

In 1997, the Faculty Professional and Instructional Development Program awarded five members of the Radford University faculty a grant to collaboratively develop online technologies and assess their appropriateness and effectiveness in a variety of learning environments. The grant supported a student in Computer Science who produced a variety of web-related technologies including such programs as on-line quizzes, bulletin boards, guestbooks, an online survey generator, etc. The grantees strove to involve a larger cross-section of the RU faculty in the use and design of web-based instructional materials and grew into an ad hoc CybeRUniversity Instructional Design Committee. It currently includes members from all of the Colleges. We continue to explore ways of seamlessly integrating the use of the World Wide Web into our courses and administrative work.

One can hardly question that the World Wide Web is fast becoming a pervasive force in education. Ten years ago, children were introduced to the computer by playing games of skill and imagination. Today, children are introduced to the computer through the World Wide Web. Young people don't expect to have information at their fingertips; they demand it. In 1989, young people wanted their Sega; now they want "Disney.com."

Students surf the web when choosing a university. Upon arrival, they expect to find course materials on the web. Access to course materials, then, purports an image of being technologically literate and therefore capable of providing a relevant education. Universities failing to demonstrate facility in this regard will fail to attract and keep the best students.

Radford University like others is experiencing this change in students' expectations. In the Fall of 1998, over 1,700 students have requested an ethernet connection to Radford University's network. This large number indicates that students are increasingly coming to Radford University with the expectation that they will engage in computer related course work.

In the field of education, three categories of web-based instruction are generally recognized. In increasing levels of web-based support these are:

Level One: Use of the World Wide Web as an information source.

Level Two: Use of the World Wide Web in an interactive way to supplement classroom-based instruction.

Level Three: Use of the World Wide Web to deliver an entire course.

Research indicates that web-enhanced courses augment the learning process (Kearsley et al., 1995; Ehrmann, 1995; Gilbert, 1995; Brooks, 1997; Schutte, 1997). Kozma and Johnson (1991) identify multiple ways, summarized below, that web-enhanced courses transform teaching, learning, and the curriculum.

Web-enhanced courses move students away from being the passive recipient of knowledge to becoming more actively engaged in the construction of knowledge.

  1. Information technology breaks down the walls between the classroom and the real world.
  2. Technology is expanding our ability to express, understand, and use ideas in other symbols.
  3. Computers can teach and drill students on a variety of rules and concepts essential to performance in a disciplinary area.
  4. Technology has helped us move from a view of learning as an individual act done in isolation toward learning as a collaborative activity. It also has moved us from the consideration of ideas in isolation to an examination of their meaning in the context of other ideas and events.
  5. Information technology empowers students to use tools that facilitate the process of scholarship.

Other research demonstrates that, when compared to traditional classes, courses that are web-enhanced report higher levels of student satisfaction; the same or better GPA and other measures of student achievement; higher levels of critical thinking and problem solving; and often more discussion between students and instructors (Kearsley et al., 1995; Schutte, 1997). Web-enhancing a course provides the additional benefit of providing the student the opportunity to "develop and enhance information technology skills as part of the undergraduate experience" (Green and Gilbert, 1995).

In addition, web-based instruction provides the opportunity for faculty and students to engage, passively or actively, in collaborative learning. Passive collaborative learning experiences could include faculty integrating into their courses web-related resources posted on the Web by other faculty members within or outside of their discipline. Active forms of collaborative learning could include faculty inviting other professors to give guest lectures in chat rooms or bulletin boards. Students could also engage in collaborative learning experiences with other students located throughout the world with similar academic interests. Another example of collaborative learning enabled by the Web is inviting authors to visit the class virtually online and engage in asynchronous or synchronous discussions.

In summary, researchers indicate that web-enhanced courses improve the learning process when individual faculty members use them as "tools" to support instruction and learning (Green and Gilbert, 1995).

Faculty in many departments at Radford University have already taken the initiative to integrate some of the aforementioned web-related technologies into their courses. Having taken this step, many faculty now feel the need to know how these initiatives might fit into a larger institutional strategy, particularly where funding priorities may have to be altered to accommodate needs in this area. The CyberUniversity Instructional Design Committee therefore proposes the following plan for encouraging and supporting web-based instruction.

I. Priority: Increase the opportunities available for faculty to develop web-enhanced courses at levels one and two.

Essential Objectives:

  1. Integrate the web-related technologies that the CyberUniversity Instructional Design Committee has already developed and employed into a comprehensive web-based package.
  2. Purchase prepackaged web-related programs that complement and expand upon the technologies developed by the CyberUniversity Instructional Design Committee.
  3. Dedicate a server for web-enhanced courses.
  4. Organize support staff familiar with web-related technologies and instructional design to assist faculty develop web-enhanced courses.

Rationale

It is our assumption that the number of faculty willing to integrate web-related technologies into their courses would increase if these technologies were more readily available and if technical support for their design and implementation were also provided.

Radford University has already made a significant investment in creating its own potentially marketable comprehensive web-based software applications for use in course instruction and management. The CyberUniversity Instructional Design Committee, in conjunction with the technical expertise of William Cobb, has created and employed an array of web-based tools. These web-based tools include a password protection program, two web-based conferencing tools (chat rooms and an electronic bulletin board), an online quiz generator, an online suggestion box, an online survey generator, a guestbook, and an online scheduler. Most importantly, these web-based tools have already been acclimated to the Unix environment particular to Radford University. The CyberUniversity Instructional Design Committee designed these web-based technologies to allow each faculty member to easily modify the programs to suit their particular pedagogical styles. The following Internet addresses show how some of the above web technologies can be used to enhance the educational experiences of Radford University students:

http://www.runet.edu/~rsheehy,

http://www.runet.edu/~junnever,

http://www.runet.edu/~swoodwar,

http://www.runet.edu/~gsantopi,

http://www.runet.edu/~bmahin, and

http://www.runet.edu/~dcogswel.

Radford University could seamlessly integrate these development tools into a comprehensive web-based package comparable to those already on the market, such as WebCt or Web in a Box, with a limited investment. This limited investment could result in a future revenue stream if Radford University marketed in its own software.

In addition, we suggest that Radford University purchase web-based course development software to complement and diversify the technologies already developed by the CyberUniversity Instructional Design Committee. A variety of course-related software exists, including comprehensive packages such as WebCT and Web in a Box, as well as more limited programs such Mallard, Whiz Quiz or Motet. Comprehensive packages, such as WebCT, include asynchronous and synchronous web-based enhancements. Examples of these tools include a conferencing system, on-line chat, student progress tracking, group project organization, student self-evaluation, grade maintenance and distribution. Other tools such as access control, navigation tools, auto-marked quizzes, electronic mail, automatic index generation, course calendar, student homepages, and course content searches are also included. Administration features of web-based course development software allow creating (or import) of student accounts, archiving e-mail messages student discussion groups and graded assessment. In general, these web-based software packages allow for three-way interaction: 1) student with content, 2) student with instructor, 3) student with other student(s). More limited programs such as Mallard, Whiz Quiz, or Motet, offer faculty members programs designed for specific web-based functions such as online quiz generators (Mallard and Whiz Quiz) or web-based conferencing (Motet). Costs associated with either a comprehensive package or the more limited packages are not prohibitive. Radford University could purchase WebCt to run on its server with unlimited faculty and student use for approximately $3,000 for a year.

Radford University could also support faculty efforts to use web-related technologies by dedicating a web server to house all web-enhanced courses. Having a server dedicated to web-enhanced courses would be important for many reasons. Having all web-enhanced courses centrally located on one server would allow a system administrator to centrally install the software rather than installing it separately in each individual faculty member's directory. It would also decrease maintenance costs by allowing a system administrator to maintain the technology from a centrally located position. Having a dedicated server would additionally increase the data transmission speed, allowing for faster asynchronous and synchronous communication and data exchange.

It is essential that Radford University create, coordinate, and support a collaborative group of staff and faculty with web related skills. There is an increasing number of faculty and staff at Radford University who have developed a level of expertise with web-related technologies. Additionally, with the funding of the Title III grant, "Creating Accessible and Responsive Educational Environments at Radford," Radford University will have on staff two experts in instructional design. Faculty considering enhancing their courses and those who have already web-enhanced their courses need continuous technical and instructional design support. It is our belief that an increasing number of faculty will consider using leading edge technologies if they have access to an organized, coordinated, and supported group of faculty and staff with technological and instructional design skills.

II. Priority: Developing web-based enhancements at level three

Essential Objectives:

  1. Create a pilot program that involves marketing a limited number of professionally oriented online courses.
  2. Create a pilot program to market to Radford University students online courses that they can take while they live and work at home during the summer. We envision this pilot program to consist of approximately five online courses primarily drawn from general education courses.

Rationale

Radford University's marketing strength is that it offers prospective students a comprehensive education in an attractive residential setting. Similar Virginia universities, such as Mary Washington College, recognize that in today's competitive market it is also necessary for universities to complement their strengths with the development and use of web-based instructional technologies.

Web-based instruction is increasingly becoming market driven. Universities are facing competition from other campuses that are marketing online courses similar to their own (e.g., Virginia Tech) and from publishers and other for-profit organizations. Currently, students living in Virginia can take accredited online courses from such universities as the University of Southern California or Virginia Tech and transfer these credits into Radford University. If this trend continues and grows, Radford University will lose a significant share of its market, resulting in lost revenues.

Online courses offer distinct advantages to students who cannot enroll in the traditional classroom-based course because of geographical limitations or scheduling conflicts. Other Virginia universities, particularly Virginia Tech, have taken a two-prong market approach to using web enhancements in instructional design and delivery. Virginia Tech and its CyberSchool have marketed courses that are oriented to the older student who may wish to upgrade their technical skills. This is the original market for web-based instruction. It also has marketed "summer school" courses to students who may want to take these courses while they work and live at home during the summer.

Radford University is already in the process of developing online courses. To view an example of an online course that could be offered in the Spring of 1999 view http://www.runet.edu/~scl-web/shocked/music111.htm .

III. Priority: Developing partnerships for web-based instruction

Essential Objective:

  1. Radford University should join with other universities to form alliances that encourage sharing expertise and instructional materials stored on the web.

Rationale

The World Wide Web has created the possibility for educational institutions to develop partnerships in offering online courses. Two such partnerships already in place that directly impact Radford University are the Southern Regional Electronic Campus and Virginia's Commonwealth Electronic Campus. The later is a voluntary consortium of public and private colleges and universities who have come together to develop a virtual campus for the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Consortia such as the above can share the development costs and efforts of producing web-enhanced courses. They can also manage the sections offered, review courses against a common standard, and administer the issues surrounding transfer credits. It is our position that Radford University could benefit in a multitude of ways if we establish a web presence by offering online courses with both of the above consortia.

Radford University's contribution to online partnerships would be consistent with its Vision Statement, which states:

Radford is committed to the use of technology both in and out of the classroom, and to the development of partnerships with other educational institutions, businesses and government agencies to ensure that current ideas and technologies are incorporated into the learning process.

IV. Priority: Develop a collaborative structure among faculty who are considering using and those who have used web-enhancing technologies in a course

Essential Objective:

  1. Radford University should organize a collaborative community of highly motivated faculty interested in furthering their students' education through the use of online technologies.
  2. Radford University should create a web site linked to its home page that is devoted to courses that faculty have enhanced with web-based technologies.

Rationale

Creating, organizing, and supporting a collaborative community of highly motivated faculty interested in furthering their students' education through the use of online technologies could contain some of the costs associated with implementing new technologies. This potential collaborative structure could create a repository of information concerning the types of technology that are available, examples of how these technologies have been employed, and could work toward collecting data that assess the effect of each technology on the educational experience. This collaborative structure could reduce the likelihood that individual faculty members will replicate the efforts of others. It could also hasten the use of online technologies by other faculty members by providing them with technical support. Additionally, it could work to build national and international collaborative connections with other faculty using online interactive technologies. The Virtual Geography Department (http://www.utexas.edu/depts/grg/virtdept/main.html ) is an example of such collaboration within a single discipline.

Creating a web site featuring web-enhanced courses linked to Radford University's home page could serve multiple purposes. It could help in the recruitment of prospective students. Increasingly, students are becoming computer literate (Green and Gilbert, 1995; Gilbert, 1995). Their computer literacy will allow them to virtually tour campuses before making their ultimate selection. Therefore, it is imperative that potential students realize that Radford University has faculty who are using the latest computer-related online technologies. This information could be conveyed to the prospective student through a web site devoted to web-enhanced courses. From this web site, students could tour a web-enhanced course of their choice. If interested, the student could email the faculty member and ask to "sit in" on a virtual office hour or listen in on a discussion happening in real time in a "conference room." In short, creating a web site for web-enhanced courses could facilitate the recruitment of students.

Creating a web site devoted to web-enhanced courses could also facilitate building a community of faculty interested in web related instruction. Faculty interested in web related instruction could visit the web site to see what technologies are available and to view how other faculty members have integrated these technologies into their instructional design. In essence, the web site could function as a virtual meeting place for faculty interested in web related instruction.

V. Priority: Creating and implementing an incentive and reward structure for developing web-enhanced courses

Essential Objectives:

1. Create a university-wide system that empowers and accordingly rewards faculty for developing and teaching web-enhanced courses.

2. To discuss with College Deans and Chairpersons the creation and implementation of an incentive and reward structure for developing web-enhanced courses.

Rationale

Teaching web-enhanced courses involves seamlessly integrating a variety of programming skills with instructional designs suited for presentation on the World Wide Web. A substantial amount of faculty-time goes into mastering these skills, developing web sites, and maintaining them after they are on the World Wide Web. We believe that Radford University must implement a university-wide system of incentives and rewards designed to encourage faculty to engage in web-based instruction.

The Faculty Staff Handbook of 1998 has taken a major step toward this goal by including the category of technology under the division of "Teaching Evaluation Categories." The Faculty Staff Handbook now reads that faculty will be rewarded for "adopting and mastering technology for instruction and use within a discipline."

The rewriting of the Faculty Staff Handbook does not guarantee that administrators, particularly Department Chairpersons, will reward faculty accordingly for adopting and mastering web-based instructional designs. An understanding of the processes involved in web-based instruction varies considerably across Chairpersons and College Deans. These variations result in an uneven incentive and reward system for faculty involved in web-based instruction. During the academic year 1998-99, the CyberUniversity Instructional Design Committee will ask to meet with Chairpersons during one of their weekly college meetings to discuss creating and implementing an incentive and reward structure. Also, during the academic year 1998-99, the CyberUniversity Instructional Design Committee is willing to offer Web-Based Instructional Workshops for College Deans and for Department Chairpersons. These workshops will familiarize the Chairs and Deans with the processes involved in web-based instruction. Our goal is to create an understanding among administrators of the amount of time and effort involved when faculty produce courses that are web-enhanced. With this knowledge, College Deans and Department Chairpersons can move forward with the Faculty Senate in creating a more explicit set of incentives and rewards for encouraging faculty to adopt and master web-based instruction.

In addition to the above, we believe that Radford University needs to add web-based instructional materials to its lists of products that Department Chairs accept as scholarly works on faculty achievement profiles, applications for tenure and promotion, and for merit increases.

A university-wide incentive program that would encourage faculty to include web-based enhancements in their courses could involve the upgrading of faculty computers. An option that could be offered to faculty who want to upgrade their computers at an accelerated rate would be to have them successfully complete workshops related to the development of web-enhanced courses. These workshops could be scheduled during the summer. Faculty who have already web-enhanced their courses, such as members of the CyberUniversity Instructional Design Committee, should be used to run the workshops and should receive a stipend for their time and expertise.

 

References

Brooks, Michael J.

1997 "Beyond teaching and learning paradigms: Trekking into the virtual university," Teaching Sociology, Vol. 27:1-14.

Ehrmann, Stephen C.

1997 "Asking the right questions what does research tell us about technology and higher learning?," Change, March/April:21-27.

Green, Kenneth C. and Steven W. Gilbert

1997 "Great expectations content, communications, productivity, and the role of information technology in higher education," Change, March/April:8-18.

Gilbert, Steven W.

1995 "Teaching, learning, & technology" The need for campuswide planning and faculty support services." Change, March/April:47-48.

1995 "Technology & the changing academy symptoms, questions, and suggestions," Change. September/October:58-61.

Johnson, David W., Roger T. Johnson, and Karl A. Smith

1991 Cooperative learning increasing faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.

Kearsley, Greg, William Lynch and David Wizer

1995 "The effectiveness and impact of online education learning in graduate education," Educational Technology,  November/December:37-42.

Kozma Robert and Jerome Johnston

1991 "The technological revolution comes to the classroom," Change, January/February.

Light, Richard J.

1990 The Harvard Assessment Seminars. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.

1996 A Shared Commitment to Excellence, December: Draft.

Schutte, Jerald G.

1997 "Virtual teaching in higher education: The new intellectual superhighway or just another traffic jam?," published on the World Wide Web http://www.csun.edu/sociology/virexp.htm

Shapiro, Wendy L., Katherine Roskos, and G. Phillip Cartwright 1995 "Technology enhanced learning environments," Change 27:67-69.

Internet Sites Related to Teaching Using the World Wide Web

CAUSE

The association for managing and using information resources in higher education: http://cause-www.colorado.edu/cause.html

CHANGE Technology Column

Collection of technology articles and resources of interest to the higher education community: http://www.educ.kent.edu/CHANGE

Clearinghouse for Subject-Oriented Internet Resources: http://www.clearinghouse.net/

EDUCCOM: Transforming Education Through Information Technology:

http://educom.edu/

Highest Education Process (HEPROC): http://rrpubs.com/heproc/

Archives for the study of faculty development, assessment, and quality:

http://www.digimark.net/educ

US Department of Education Technology Initiative http://www.ed.gov/Technology/

The Online Internet Institute: http://oii.org/

AcademicNet Home Page http://www.academic.com/

WebCT - World Wide Web Course Tools http://homebrew.cs.ubc.ca/webct/

Center for Educational Outreach and Innovation http://www.tc.columbia.edu/~academic/ceoi/